Game Theory: Key Applications and Concepts
Real-World Strategy: Applying theoretical models to economic systems, behavioral observations, and evolutionary dynamics.
Happy Saturday!
Insight Trunk is a free lifetime library—a modern replacement for outdated encyclopedias. From Monday to Saturday, we deliver a 10-minute read on a specific subject, with fresh topics each week. Two years later, we revisit each theme with updated insights from our archives—so you’ll never miss a thing. You can unsubscribe anytime using the link at the bottom of this newsletter.
We conclude by applying game theory to real-world scenarios like auctions and bargaining. We’ll also examine Evolutionary Game Theory, which studies strategic behavior from a biological perspective, and briefly touch upon behavioral game theory, acknowledging players’ non-rational tendencies.
🧑💻 In this week’s edition: Game Theory
Monday - Foundations and Representation
Tuesday - Solving Simultaneous Games
Wednesday - Solving Sequential Games
Thursday - Games with Incomplete Information
Friday - Dynamic and Repeated Games
Saturday - Key Applications and Concepts
Question of the day
What is the equilibrium bidding strategy in a standard second-price (Vickrey) auction?
Let’s find out !
Key Applications and Concepts
Let’s break it down in today discussion:
Examining Auctions, Bargaining, and Competitive Markets
Understanding Evolutionary Game Theory and Stability
Exploring Cooperative vs. Non-Cooperative Games
Reviewing Risk Attitudes and Behavioral Game Theory
Read Time : 10 minutes
📈 Examining Auctions, Bargaining, and Competitive Markets
Game theory provides indispensable analytical tools for understanding economic institutions where strategic interdependence is paramount. Three primary areas benefit significantly from this formal approach: auctions, bargaining, and competitive markets.
Auctions are modeled as games of incomplete information because a bidder knows their own private valuation but not that of their rivals. The game’s design dictates the optimal strategy. For instance, in a second-price (Vickrey) auction, the dominant strategy is to bid exactly one’s true valuation, regardless of the expected behavior of others. Conversely, in a first-price auction, the optimal strategy requires a downward shading of the bid to maximize the expected payoff.
Bargaining processes are frequently analyzed as sequential games. These models emphasize the importance of time preference and the capacity to make credible commitments. Models like the Rubinstein bargaining model use backward induction to demonstrate how patience and the proposer’s ability to commit to an ultimatum dictate the final division of the surplus.
In competitive markets, particularly oligopolies, firms’ profits are mutually dependent. Game theory models, such as the Cournot (quantity competition) or Bertrand (price competition) duopolies, determine the Nash Equilibrium of the market. These applications reveal how firms rationally anticipate rivals’ responses to their own actions, establishing a stable market outcome where no single firm has an incentive to unilaterally deviate.
Learn more about what we discussed by watching this video!
🧬 Understanding Evolutionary Game Theory and Stability
Evolutionary Game Theory (EGT) offers a significant departure from classical game theory by relaxing the demanding assumption of perfect rationality. EGT analyzes how strategies spread and persist within a population through mechanisms of replication or imitation, rather than conscious, forward-looking maximization.
In EGT, the “payoff” is often interpreted as fitness (in biological contexts) or reproductive success, and “players” are types within a population. Successful strategies, those yielding higher payoffs, are more likely to be replicated or adopted by future generations of players. This framework focuses on population dynamics—how the frequency of different strategies changes over time in response to the strategies prevalent in the rest of the population.
The central solution concept in EGT is the Evolutionarily Stable Strategy (ESS), introduced by John Maynard Smith. An ESS is a strategy that, once adopted by the vast majority of the population, cannot be successfully invaded by a small group of “mutant” individuals employing a different strategy. The ESS condition requires that the ESS strategy must be a better response against itself than the mutant strategy is, and if the payoff is equal, the ESS must be a better response against the mutant strategy than the mutant is against itself.
While initially developed for biological problems (e.g., hawk-dove game), EGT has been widely applied to social sciences. It explains the emergence and stability of societal norms, conventions (like traffic laws or language), and even cooperation. For instance, the persistence of certain ethical behaviors can be explained as strategies that are evolutionarily stable within a social group, even if they appear sub-optimal for the individual in a single interaction.
Broaden your understanding by watching this video.
🤝 Exploring Cooperative vs. Non-Cooperative Games
Game theory is fundamentally bifurcated into two major branches defined by the players’ ability to make binding agreements: non-cooperative and cooperative game theory. This distinction determines the analytical tools and solution concepts employed.
The principles of non-cooperative game theory—which have defined most of the prior days’ discussions—analyze scenarios where players are unable to form external, binding contracts. Players must act purely in their self-interest, often leading to outcomes like the Nash Equilibrium, which may be individually rational but collectively sub-optimal (e.g., the Prisoner’s Dilemma). The focus is on the individual’s choice of strategy from a set of available actions.
In contrast, cooperative game theory analyzes situations where players can negotiate and enforce binding agreements to form coalitions. The analytical focus shifts from individual optimal strategies to the stability of these coalitions and the fairness of the resulting surplus distribution. The central problem becomes one of dividing the gains achievable by the group, rather than predicting specific actions.
Key solution concepts in the cooperative framework include the core and the Shapley value. The core identifies the set of payoff distributions that are stable because no sub-group of players (coalition) can achieve a better outcome for themselves by breaking away. The Shapley value offers a unique method for dividing the total gains based on each player’s marginal contribution to all possible coalitions, providing a measure of fairness.
This is the ultimate video you need to watch to start applying game theory in your life.
🧠 Reviewing Risk Attitudes and Behavioral Game Theory
Traditional game theory is built upon the assumption of Homo economicus—a perfectly rational agent who is self-interested and risk-neutral. Behavioral Game Theory challenges this foundation by incorporating empirical observations from psychological research and laboratory experiments into strategic analysis.
A critical deviation from the traditional model involves risk attitudes. While standard theory assumes players maximize expected utility, real-world players exhibit varying degrees of risk preference. A risk-averse player, for instance, prefers a certain outcome over a gamble with the same or even slightly higher expected value. Conversely, a risk-loving player might choose the gamble. Incorporating the utility function’s curvature (convex for risk-loving, concave for risk-averse) significantly alters equilibrium predictions in games involving uncertain payoffs.
Behavioral models also examine phenomena like bounded rationality, recognizing that human computational power and time are limited. Furthermore, social preferences, such as concerns for fairness and altruism, frequently override pure self-interest. The Ultimatum Game , where a proposer offers a division of a sum of money and the responder can reject it (resulting in zero payoff for both), is a canonical example: Responders frequently reject small but positive offers out of a sense of unfairness, a result unexplained by standard, purely self-interested Nash Equilibrium.
By utilizing experimental data, behavioral game theory refines theoretical predictions, explaining deviations from the Nash Equilibrium and offering a more accurate, descriptive model of human strategic interaction. This provides essential context for applying game theory concepts to real-world social and economic decisions.
Summary
Applications in Economics (Auctions, Bargaining, Markets)
Game theory is essential for analyzing auctions, modeling bidders’ strategies under incomplete information about rivals’ valuations.
The optimal strategy in a second-price auction is simply to bid one’s true, private valuation.
Bargaining is analyzed as a sequential game where factors like patience and credible threats determine the distribution of surplus.
Oligopoly behavior in competitive markets (e.g., Cournot or Bertrand) is modeled to find the stable Nash Equilibrium of pricing or quantity decisions.
Evolutionary Game Theory (EGT)
Evolutionary Game Theory relaxes the assumption of perfect rationality, focusing on strategies that spread through populations based on success.
Strategies yielding higher fitness or payoff are more likely to be adopted or inherited by future generations.
The central solution is the Evolutionarily Stable Strategy (ESS), which cannot be successfully invaded by alternative “mutant” strategies.
EGT provides insights into the stability and emergence of social conventions, norms, and even cooperation without requiring conscious calculation.
Cooperative vs. Non-Cooperative Games
Non-cooperative game theory analyzes interactions where players pursue self-interest and cannot form binding agreements (solved by NE).
Cooperative game theory studies scenarios where players can form binding coalitions and contracts to maximize collective gain.
The focus of the cooperative branch is on how to divide the surplus achieved by the coalition.
Solution concepts like the core and the Shapley value define stable and fair distributions of the cooperative payoff.
Behavioral Game Theory and Risk
Behavioral Game Theory incorporates psychological factors and observed human deviations from the perfectly rational model.
It acknowledges that players exhibit varying risk attitudes (aversion or loving), which changes how they evaluate uncertain expected payoffs.
The concept of bounded rationality recognizes the limits of human cognitive ability and time in complex strategic calculation.
Behavioral models, such as those applied to the Ultimatum Game, show that social preferences like fairness often influence decisions more than pure self-interest.
Use Nash Equilibrium to predict competitive market moves.
Model Competitor Actions: Create a simple 2 x 2 payoff matrix mapping your firm’s actions against a key competitor’s actions.
Map Payoffs to Metrics: Define payoffs using relevant business metrics like profit margin, market share, or revenue.
Identify Best Responses: Determine your firm’s optimal action (best response) for each of your competitor’s possible strategies.
Locate the Intersection: Find the point (the Nash Equilibrium) where both firms are simultaneously playing their best response to the other’s choice.
Predict Stable Behavior: Use the NE to predict the stable pricing, advertising, or product development strategy that both firms will likely settle upon.
Answer of the day
What is the equilibrium bidding strategy in a standard second-price (Vickrey) auction?
Bid exactly your true valuation.
In a second-price auction, bidding your true valuation is a dominant strategy . Bidding higher risks paying more than the item is worth, and bidding lower risks losing the item when you could have won it at an acceptable price. Therefore, it is always optimal to bid sincerely, regardless of the other bidders.
That’s A Wrap!
Want to take a break? You can unsubscribe anytime by clicking “unsubscribe” at the bottom of your email.